<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Update on Twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lorennorman.com/startup-culture/the-update-on-twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lorennorman.com/startup-culture/the-update-on-twitter/</link>
	<description>Loren\</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 06:42:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: loren</title>
		<link>http://lorennorman.com/startup-culture/the-update-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>loren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 03:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lorennorman.com/?p=31#comment-92</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your thoughts, Sean.  A hard limit on followers would indeed mitigate the problem of power-users, but I have to admit that I think a lot of the power and value of Twitter is that it DOESN&#039;T seek to tell you how to use it.  This is shown to be a strength as we see more and more services leveraging the Twitter API, which is embodies the spirit of &quot;do what you want with it.&quot;

I think the real solution is a switch in the organization of their architecture.  Twitter should be organized as a message passing system, not &quot;blog style&quot; where everything goes straight into the database and then gets served from the database.  It&#039;s actually quite tempting to spend a weekend reimplementing Twitter using Amazon SQS.

As for Scoble, I&#039;ve unfollowed him already due to too much noise!  Others, like Leo Laporte and friends, are much better, so how can you tell users they aren&#039;t allowed to follow him because too many already are?  Besides, wouldn&#039;t they just start creating multiple accounts and cross-posting to them all?  That&#039;d probably be a whole new scaling problem...

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your thoughts, Sean.  A hard limit on followers would indeed mitigate the problem of power-users, but I have to admit that I think a lot of the power and value of Twitter is that it DOESN&#8217;T seek to tell you how to use it.  This is shown to be a strength as we see more and more services leveraging the Twitter API, which is embodies the spirit of &#8220;do what you want with it.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think the real solution is a switch in the organization of their architecture.  Twitter should be organized as a message passing system, not &#8220;blog style&#8221; where everything goes straight into the database and then gets served from the database.  It&#8217;s actually quite tempting to spend a weekend reimplementing Twitter using Amazon SQS.</p>
<p>As for Scoble, I&#8217;ve unfollowed him already due to too much noise!  Others, like Leo Laporte and friends, are much better, so how can you tell users they aren&#8217;t allowed to follow him because too many already are?  Besides, wouldn&#8217;t they just start creating multiple accounts and cross-posting to them all?  That&#8217;d probably be a whole new scaling problem&#8230;</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sean808080</title>
		<link>http://lorennorman.com/startup-culture/the-update-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>sean808080</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 01:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lorennorman.com/?p=31#comment-91</guid>
		<description>i meant twitter of course. damn booze!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i meant twitter of course. damn booze!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sean808080</title>
		<link>http://lorennorman.com/startup-culture/the-update-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>sean808080</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 01:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lorennorman.com/?p=31#comment-90</guid>
		<description>well to be honest, if i were ev i&#039;d just say point blank, no twitter user can have more than 2000 followers.  after that it becomes less of what twitter is meant to be, which is a microblogging platform in the social sense.  when people like scoble use twitter to puff up their reach, it becomes less social and more of a broadcast medium which is not what twitter is meant to be.

it&#039;s a simple problem to solve if they had some balls and specified what the true point of seesmic was.  they&#039;re trying to be all things to all people and that is always a trap.

would you miss tweets from scoble? i surely wouldn&#039;t.  do you get irritated when twitter goes down sporadically, hell yeah!  

which is more important to you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well to be honest, if i were ev i&#8217;d just say point blank, no twitter user can have more than 2000 followers.  after that it becomes less of what twitter is meant to be, which is a microblogging platform in the social sense.  when people like scoble use twitter to puff up their reach, it becomes less social and more of a broadcast medium which is not what twitter is meant to be.</p>
<p>it&#8217;s a simple problem to solve if they had some balls and specified what the true point of seesmic was.  they&#8217;re trying to be all things to all people and that is always a trap.</p>
<p>would you miss tweets from scoble? i surely wouldn&#8217;t.  do you get irritated when twitter goes down sporadically, hell yeah!  </p>
<p>which is more important to you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

